Robert Haas escreveu: > I have always assumed that there is some very good reason why EXPLAIN > ANALYZE reports the number of rows as an integer rather than a > floating point value, but in reading explain.c it seems that the > reason is just that we decided to round to zero decimal places. Any > chance we could reconsider this decision? I often find myself wanting > to know the value that is here called ntuples, but rounding > ntuples/nloops off to the nearest integer loses too much precision. > Don't you think is too strange having, for example, 6.67 rows? I would confuse users and programs that parses the EXPLAIN output. However, I wouldn't object to add ntuples to an extended explain output (as discussed in the other thread).
-- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
