On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Kevin Grittner <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > I was going to try to scare up some resources to advance this if we > could get to some consensus. I don't get the feeling we're there yet. > Suggestions welcome.
I think I might've said this before, but I think you need to do (or get someone with knowledge of the code to do) more looking at the lock bookkeeping that's required to make the SIREAD stuff work and try to figure out if it's even feasible for PostgreSQL and what the performance costs would be (an idea of how much code complexity this would introduce would be good too). A lot of the "lack of consensus" at this point looks to me more like "lack of being sure whether this can actually work". I don't know that we're going to get any closer to consensus without some less-handwavy answer to that question. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
