On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > In any case, what we seem to have here is evidence that there are some > cases where the new default value of default_statistics_target is too > high and you can get a benefit by lowering it. I'm not sure we should > panic about that. Default values ought to be compromises. If people > only ever change the default in one direction then it's probably not a > very good compromise. We know that there are applications for which 100 > is still too low, so maybe now we have got the pain spread out roughly > evenly...
I would be nice to get oprofile working and see results for various target sizes. I've had trouble with oprofile myself. I think some machines have bogus rtc hardware or something related that prevents it from working properly. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
