Greg Stark <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Tom Lane<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Greg Stark <[email protected]> writes:
>>> TABLE test2 CONSTRAINT test2_y_fkey FOREIGN KEY (y) REFERENCES test1(a);
>>
>> +1
> Even there the "TABLE" is kind of optional. It would stlil make sense as
> Referenced by:
> test2 CONSTRAINT test2_y_fkey FOREIGN KEY (y) REFERENCES test1(a)
I think that goes against our message style guidelines (46.3.9:
"When citing the name of an object, state what kind of object it is").
Not sure if brevity is worth a small chance of confusion.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
