Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > + # > + # Structure/union pointers in function prototypes and definitions have an > extra > + # space after the asterisk: > + # > + # void x(struct xxc * a); > > > I know we should not be driven by our tools, but is there a case for a > coding standard that requires use of a typedef name here?
We use things like struct timeval and struct tm ... I don't think we should be creating typedefs for those, so it would be good to find a more general solution. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
