* Simon Riggs: > On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 15:09 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > >> the testcase discusses here is indeed CHAR(n) vs. VARCHAR. > > OK, thanks for pointing out my error.
But I think your point still makes sense. Is it really necessary to determine the unpadded length for a query such as this one? "SELECT c from sbtest where id between $1 and $2 order by c" (See the start of the thread.) -- Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
