Kevin Grittner wrote:
8.3.7
real 0m24.249s
real 0m24.054s
real 0m24.361s
8.4rc1
real 0m33.503s
real 0m34.198s
real 0m33.931s
Ugh. This looks like a poster child case for a benchfarm ...
Is there any chance you guys could triangulate this a bit? Good initial
triangulation points might be the end of each commitfest. (I have a
vested interest in making sure COPY performance doesn't regress, since
it will affect parallel restore's speed in spades.)
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
