On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:24:28 -0400 Tom Lane wrote:
> "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsm...@wars-nicht.de> writes:
> > the small attached patch changes the error message for a blocked
> > database in case there are prepared transactions.
>
> Isn't this duplicative of the errdetail_busy_db code? And anyway
> I do not see a reason not to consider prepared transactions as
> "other users".
Because you know the details.
Most other users check pg_stat_activity just to find out there is no
other user connected. A prepared transaction is not a connected user,
so the error message is still misleading.
You are right with the errdetail_busy_db(), but that's only true for
8.4, not for earlier versions. In addition that's only true if you
haven't supressed the hints like some scripts do (-q as example).
Bye
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors
Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project
PGDay.eu 2009 in Paris, Nov. 6/7, http://www.pgday.eu/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
