"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am checking the indexStruct->indisprimary field, but it always resolves to
> false. indisunique works fine. It is a trivial change to the ADD UNIQUE
> code, but it doesn't work. Viewing the system catalogs and '\d' both show
> the indices as primary, but the SearchSysCache funtion believes that they
> are not.
Doesn't make any sense to me either. Want to post your code?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] Beta time Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Beta time Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Beta time Bruce Momjian
