Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > I have zero interest in trying to support either. I doubt it's even > possible --- the backend code has no way to inform the dynamic loader > how to resolve cross-library references. So if the DL doesn't already > understand the dependency it's never going to work.
Ok, that means less work for the extension facility (it was not targetted for it's first incarnation anyway) stuff. FWIW, I had in mind to use the dependancy information in the extension meta-data to issue more than one "dlopen()" when a plugin function is called. I'm being told that in my case linking uuid-ossp.so against uuid.so should do the trick, though. I'll drop the idea off the scope of the extension facility. Regards, -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
