On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Kevin Grittner<kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > I think you mean byte where you've said bit.
you're correct. I'm being a nerf. > Boolean would be > adequate for a single bit, and I haven't (so far) seen any database > which supports both a single-bit type and a boolean. wasn't aware of that. I'm admittedly most familiar with sqlite, postgres, and mysql > Many databases > support a TINYINT type as a single-byte value, although I'm not sure > there's consistency on whether that's a signed or unsigned value. wouldn't any implementation in pg support both? -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
