Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> In retrospect, the CF idea took some of the edge off the problem of >> lots of large patches arriving at the feature freeze deadline, but it >> is far from having eliminated the problem.
> The beta preparation is dealing with all open issues, which is different > than the focus of the commit-fest. Ideally we would be addressing those > open/bug issues during normal development, but for the hard problems > seem to linger and then we have to deal with them during beta > preparation, which can take 1-2 months. We've never scheduled a "beta preparation" phase like that before, and I don't recall you complaining about the lack of one in the 8.4 schedule. Personally I think the slip is entirely due to the final CF taking five months (we closed it 25-March) where we'd expected something closer to one month. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers