Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it IS newest at the bottom, and I agree that that is how it > should be. It seems to be inconsistent. Probably because everything wound up with the same date, the order is probably more-or-less random. What are the chances that the date or timestamp of the corresponding wiki modification could be put onto the patch and comment lines? (One would hope that could be done with a script, rather than by hand....) -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
