On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Zdenek Kotala<zdenek.kot...@sun.com> wrote: > Robert Haas píše v čt 02. 07. 2009 v 22:16 -0400: >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotala<zdenek.kot...@sun.com> wrote: > >> Also, how would we handle changes by committers, who >> don't always go through the CommitFest process? > > I think that all head patches should go to through a new tool for > recording also in case when developer is commiter itself.
You'll have to put that argument to the committers; but I expect a cool reception. I think what would be more useful is if we could somehow associated metadata with each commit. Right now, for example, the author of a patch is not stored with the patch in any structured way; it's just typed in, usually but not always as the last line of the commit. So you can't easily find out what lines of code a certain person has touched, for example. The sorts of problems that you're talking about seem broadly in the same vein. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
