On Tuesday 12 May 2009 08:36:20 Khee Chin wrote: > postgres=# \di idx_foo_bt_fooi; > List of relations > Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Table | Method | > Definition > --------+-----------------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------------- >---------------- public | idx_foo_bt_fooi | index | rubik | foo | btree | > md5((a)::text), md5((a || b)) > (1 row) > > postgres=# \d idx_foo_bt_fooi; > Index "public.idx_foo_bt_fooi" > Column | Type | Definition > -----------------+------+-------------- > pg_expression_1 | text | md5(a::text) > pg_expression_2 | text | md5(a || b) > btree, for table "public.foo"
I have committed the second part, the additions to the \d output. I think the sentiment was against changing the \di output. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
