On Tuesday 07 July 2009 19:35:54 Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > On Sunday 10 May 2009 03:05:48 dam...@dalibo.info wrote: > >> Here's a second version. Main changes are : > >> > >> * Child tables are sorted by name > >> * \d only shows the number of child tables > >> * \d+ shows the full list > > > > Committed. > > I looked at this patch. I'm a bit disturbed by the > ORDER BY c.oid::pg_catalog.regclass > business. I doubt that does what the author thinks, and I'm not sure > what we really want anyway. If we want the child table names sorted > alphabetically then the regclass value needs to be further cast to text, > ie > ORDER BY c.oid::pg_catalog.regclass::pg_catalog.text
Fixed; it was clearly meant to be by name. Creation order might be useful, but we don't really support that anywhere else. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
