Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> With the wiki, the data of the old fests will pretty much stay what is
> was, unless we change the wiki templates in drastic ways, as I
> understand it. But if we did changes like the above, or more
> complicated things, perhaps, what will happen? Perhaps we simply
> don't care about the historical data. But if we do, we better have
> pretty high confidence that the current application will do for a
> while or is easily upgradable.
I'm not convinced that we care in the least about commitfests that are
more than a fest or two back; especially since the mailing lists archive
all the interesting underlying data. However, if we did, the answer
doesn't seem that hard: keep the old database instance on-line for
serving up the old data, and put a new one beside it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
