Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
I think you should have it use pthreads if available, or Windows threads
there, or fork() elsewhere.
Hmm, but how will you communicate stats back from the sub-processes?
pg_restore doesn't need anything more than a success/failure result
from its child processes, but I think pgbench will want more.
My first reaction is to say "use a pipe."
cheers
andtrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
