Jamie Fox wrote: > Hi - > REINDEX INDEX pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index; > > This seems to have fixed the problem, lo_open of lob data is working again - > now to see how vacuumlo likes it.
So did it work? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers