Jamie Fox wrote:

> Hi -
> REINDEX INDEX pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index;
> 
> This seems to have fixed the problem, lo_open of lob data is working again -
> now to see how vacuumlo likes it.

So did it work?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to