Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <g...@pointblue.com.pl> writes:
> On 16 Jul 2009, at 14:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> the standard does not promise that type _Bool has size = 1 byte.
>>>> We have to have that because of on-disk compatibility requirements.
>>> I think the latter is easily fixable, or forceable to be one byte.
>> How do you plan to do that?
> by casting it to 1 byte type such as char ?
That's hardly going to improve readability for anyone. Also, it will
flat out not work for the catalog struct declarations. When we say
"bool relhasindex;" the compiler had better think that that's a
one-byte field.
> And it is pretty annoying, when your product also has its own BOOLean
> defined...
IOW you're not using stdbool either?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
