On Thursday 16 July 2009 17:00:03 Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Peter Eisentraut<pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > So I think either decoration is added to all of these files or none of > > them. And I think the former is not going to go over well. > > We do have some things that are conditioned on __cplusplus already, > such as "c.h", "pg_config.h.in", and "postgres_ext.h". So at some > point we at least thought about supporting inclusion of our header > files from C++. But I agree that if we're going to do it at all, we > ought to do it everywhere.
We do support using the frontend headers (libpq, ecpg) from C++. That's what postgres_ext.h is about. The code in pg_config.h.in is autogenerated by Autoconf. The stuff in c.h is probably still there from before we rearranged the header files so that the frontend includes don't use c.h. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
