* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Petr Jelinek<pjmo...@pjmodos.net> wrote: > > The docs are not complete but that's up to Stephen, otherwise the patch > > should be finished. But I am not the reviewer :) > > Well, perhaps we had better prod Stephen then, since complete docs are > a requirement for commit.
I didn't think the docs posted were terrible, but I am working on improving them. > > Anyway, while this patch might not necessary get commited in this commit > > fest, I'd still like to have opinion from one of the commiters on "the VIEW > > problem" which also affects grant on all patch ( see > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-07/msg00957.php ) and I > > fear "returned with feedback" might prevent that until next commit fest. > > OK, hopefully one of them will chime in with an opinion. As I say, I > would like to see this get committed if it's done, I just wasn't sure > it was. But now it seems that was due to insufficiently careful > reading of the thread, with the exception of this issue and the need > to finish the docs. Working on it... Not that we've never committed stuff with less than complete docs before.. ;) Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
