Robert Haas wrote: > I think the best thing for this patch right now is to move it to > "Returned with Feedback". I can't see any way that this patch is > going to be made committable for this CommitFest, and I think that > pretending otherwise is only encouraging KaiGai to do another of his > lighting rework-and-resubmits. While those are very impressive, > they're not getting us where we need to be. I think that what KaiGai > needs to do here is get the spec written (with the help of Greg > Williamson and anyone else who is willing to pitch in), and submit it > for comments. I don't think there will be a problem getting that > reviewed outside of a CommitFest, and it's not a patch anyway, so the > time that it gets submitted is not crucial. What is crucial is that > it is a good spec that everyone can read, and hopefully understand and > discuss. There is no point writing any more code, or submitting any > more patches, until we have agreement on what those patches are > supposed to do.
I also agree that the easy understandable specification what SE-PostgreSQL tries to achieve is more important than implementation. I described it from the scratch again. Here is an initial draft: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SEPostgreSQL_Draft I would like to improve documentation quality and fix its specification during the discussion. > I am going to go ahead and mark this as "Returned with Feedback". Agreed. -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers