mahendra chavan <mah...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I meant by de-correlation was optimizing a query to get rid of > sub-queirs by using joins. > > eg. In the TPC-H schema, a query to find out the names of suppliers > who supply parts having size < 100 > > *Query with nested subqueries:* > > SELECT > S_NAME > FROM > SUPPLIER > WHERE > S_SUPPKEY > IN ( > SELECT > PS_SUPPKEY > FROM > PARTSUPP > WHERE > PS_PARTKEY > IN ( > SELECT > P_PARTKEY > FROM > PART > WHERE > P_SIZE < 100 > ) > > > > *Query with joins without subqueries:* > > > SELECT > S_NAME > FROM > SUPPLIER > INNER JOIN > PARTSUPP > ON > S_SUPPKEY = PS_SUPPKEY > INNER JOIN > PART > ON > P_PARTKEY = PS_PARTKEY > WHERE > P_SIZE < 100 > Those two queries aren't exactly identical, because you could get duplicate rows in the second which would not be there in the first. Optimizations to "pull up" subqueries into a higher level FROM clause as joins have been in PostgreSQL for as long as I've been using it, but the ability to do the specific optimization you show there (without the duplicates) was added in version 8.4 using "semi-joins". I don't think any syntax was added to explicitly write a query using semi-joins, though; it's an optimization of EXISTS, IN, ANY, etc. To see how the planner chooses to execute a given query against a particular schema which has a particular set of statistics about the data distributions, use the EXPLAIN option. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/sql-explain.html -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
