On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 14:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Hmmm ... that suggests that we may not be handling IS DISTINCT FROM > correctly for rowtypes. I haven't read that part of the spec, but > I would've guessed that the spec wants it to be consistent with > IS NULL. >
Our behavior appears to match the standard, which covers this case in 8.15.General Rules.1.c.iv. Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers