> Marko Kreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I wonder whether we should retire -o.
>
> > How about putting -o stuff after -p? That way only postmaster
> > code can set PGC_POSTMASTER options for a backend, no way for
> > user to mess up. ATM this would break -o -F tho'.
Not sure what you are suggesting here. Should we keep -o but say all
options after -o are passed to postgres backends:
postmaster -a -b -c -o -f -g -h
In this case, -abc goes to postmaster and -fgh goes to postgres.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
