Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > Alvaro Herrera írta: > > Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > > > >> The vague consensus for syntax options was that the GUC > >> 'lock_timeout' and WAIT [N] extension (wherever NOWAIT > >> is allowed) both should be implemented. > >> > >> Behaviour would be that N seconds timeout should be > >> applied to every lock that the statement would take. > > > > In http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/291.1242053...@sss.pgh.pa.us > > Tom argues that lock_timeout should be sufficient. I'm not sure what > > does WAIT [N] buy. > > Syntax consistency with NOWAIT?
Consistency could also be achieved by removing NOWAIT, but I don't see you proposing that. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
