On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Well, of course the existing tests are not going to exercise XML or > JSON output format. Dunno how much we care. I had supposed that > XML or JSON would always emit all the fields and leave it to the > recipient to suppress what they don't want. If we want to have > platform-independent regression tests then we'd need to make the > COSTS option effective for XML/JSON format --- do we want that?
Well, as I've said many, many times on these threads, I feel strongly that the choice of output format shouldn't for the most part affect the information which is displayed. Output format should be an option, and the information to display should be an option, and the two should be, as far as possible, separate. So what you're suggesting is the way it works now. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00879.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00916.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00917.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-05/msg00989.php ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
