David Fetter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:18:55PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: >> KaiGai, >> >> * KaiGai Kohei (kai...@ak.jp.nec.com) wrote: >>> I began to describe the list of abstraction layer functions (but not >>> completed yet): >>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SEPostgreSQL_Abstraction >> I'm not really a huge fan of 'security_' as a prefix for these >> functions, but I don't have a better suggestion right now. > > Just generally, "access control" is a great way to describe what's > actually happening here. That people conflate access control with > security has resulted in a number of disasters :P
My concern is "access_control_" is a bit long for prefixes, but "ac_" is too short to represent what it is doing. -- OSS Platform Development Division, NEC KaiGai Kohei <kai...@ak.jp.nec.com> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
