> So, we are just trying to whip into shape explain diagnostics which are > in JSON or XML, and now you want us to exclude XML from this one because > you don't like it? Can we please try for some consistency? > > Sorry to break it to you, but there are plenty of people and businesses > who want XML. And I certainly don't want to have to master every data > representation model out there. XML has far more traction than anything > else that's comparable in my experience. > > The fact that Greg is prepared to suggest CSV, with its obvious serious > deficiencies, as being *better* than XML, makes his whole argument > highly suspect IMNSHO.
>From a business perspective, XML is the only viable option for output. Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
