Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > Excluding every database that has a composite/array-of > user-defined-type/enum type would be pretty nasty. After all, these > are features we boast of. Any idea whether domains are an issue? I was thinking of trying this tool soon, and we don't seem to be using any of the problem features -- unless type issues include domains. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
