Michael Meskes <mes...@postgresql.org> writes:
> Tom, AFAICT we only need one core grammar change, moving the cursor name to
> it's own rule that only resolves back to name. This rule should be eliminated
> by bison during the build process anyway, so I see no problem adding it. It
> does make the ecpg changes way smaller though. Is this okay with you?
Sure, that one didn't bother me. It was the FORWARD/BACKWARD decomposition
that looked unnecessary (as your tests seem to bear out).
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
