On Monday 10 August 2009 14:39:22 Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: > > I produced/mailed a relaxng version for a a bit older version and I plan > > to refresh and document it once the format seems suitably stable. I am > > not sure it is yet. If yes, this should not take that long... > > (Relaxng because you easily can convert it into most other XML schema > > description languages) > I don't mind doing both, but I think one should be authoritative, and > whatever the relative technical merits are (please, let's not debate > that here) the fact after quite some years is that XML Schemas have much > more traction. See the thread that starts at > <http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200804/msg00058.html>. For > example, Xerces-J supports XML Schemas natively. I don't really mind which format gets choosen - I just had relaxng one already done. Do you plan to write a XML-Schema Schema? Just to avoid duplicated work...
Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
