On Monday 03 August 2009 17:44:32 Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > Does it need a version number change? Maybe just a tag (no branch) is > > all that is required. > > I think that we do want the alpha releases to identify themselves as > such. And we want a marker in CVS as to what state the alpha release > corresponds to. Peter's label-and-undo approach seems like a kluge; > and it doesn't scale to consider the possibility that we might > want to re-release an alpha after fixing some particularly evil bug. > A tag without a branch won't handle that either. > > I feel that making a branch is the way to go. If we try to get away > with a shortcut, we'll probably regret it.
Well then, naming: Branch: ??? Tag: REL8_5_ALPHA1 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
