Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 19:04, Peter Eisentraut<pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On Thursday 06 August 2009 17:33:40 Tom Lane wrote: > >> I don't think there'd be much logical difficulty in having an output > >> field (ie, CSV column or log_line_prefix escape) that represents a > >> classification of the PID, say as "postmaster, backend, AV worker, > >> AV launcher, bgwriter, ...". ?It would only require changing things > >> in one place, whereas your original proposal seemed mighty open-ended. > > > > You might be able to achieve that if you use the %q escape and put something > > after the %q that you can search for. > > You could do part of it, but you could still not differ them from each > other. And really, it seems very much like a kludge to me. I'd rather > have a "proper field" for it.
Is this a TODO? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
