Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > OK, so it is "warm slave". That is technically accurate, given the preceding definitions, but it has disturbing connotations. Enough so, in my view, to merit getting a little more creative in the naming. How about "warm replica"? Other ideas? I agree that the present moniker misleads. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
