Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, so it is "warm slave". That is technically accurate, given the preceding definitions, but it has disturbing connotations. Enough so, in my view, to merit getting a little more creative in the naming. How about "warm replica"? Other ideas? I agree that the present moniker misleads. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
