Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Perhaps it'd be a better idea for the option of a freebie conversion
>> to be checked earlier, say immediately after we discover there is no
>> exact match for the function name and input type. Thomas, what do you
>> think?
> We *really* need that catalog lookup first. Otherwise, we will never be
> able to override the hardcoded compatibility assumptions in that
> matching routine.
Sure, I said *after* we fail to find an exact match. But the "freebie"
match is for a function name that matches a type name and is
binary-compatible with the source type. That's not a weak constraint.
ISTM that interpretation should take priority over interpretations that
involve more than one level of transformation.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
