Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > On 8/17/09 11:51 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I went over this quickly, and attach an updated version. This is >> updated to current CVS HEAD, and wordsmithed a little bit, and I removed >> some things that didn't seem worth documenting. In particular, the >> introduction claims that back-patched bug fixes won't be documented >> here, which I agree with (at least for minor fixes); but that policy >> wasn't being applied consistently.
> I thought the Windows memory thing was a back-patch? It is, but it seems worth mentioning for testing purposes, since it's a portability issue. See prior discussion. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers