Tom Lane wrote: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: >> 2009/8/19 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >>> I don't believe there is any consensus for integrating dblink into core, >>> and I for one will resist that strongly. Â Keep it in contrib. > >> if integration means, so I could to write query like >> SELECT * FROM otherdatabase.schema.table .... >> UPDATE otherdb.table SET ... >> I am for integration. > > That is not what "integrating dblink" means --- what Itagaki-san is > talking about is moving the dblink_xxx functions into core. What > you are talking about is actual SQL/MED functionality, which we should > indeed try to get into core someday. But dblink is a dead end as far > as standards compliance goes. Between that and the potential security > issues, we should not put it in core.
+1 Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
