On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Tom Lane<t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > You can see that from the fact that the estimated row width is > 8 bytes (two integers) ... but tenthous is nowhere to be seen in the > Output: line.
+1 for self-consistent output. If we're including their size in "width" then they should be in the output list. If there was some way to mark the junk columns so users could tell which columns are being used higher up and which aren't -- which might be helpful if there are ambiguous names -- then that might be good. Nothing comes to mind offhand that wouldn't just be a lot of clutter though. -- greg http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
