On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:46:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matt...@zeut.net> writes: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> This seems a good idea. Possibly pushing the betas more > >> aggresively to current users would make them tested not only by > >> PG hackers ... > > > Isn't this the purpose of the new alpha releases, at lease to some > > extent. > > The alpha releases as currently constituted are practically the > exact opposite of what's being suggested here :-(. We are pushing > them out without very much advertisement, and certainly without any > formal program to encourage significant testing. That's more or > less forced by the decision that alpha releases should be > low-overhead, but I think we're unlikely to get wide-ranging test > coverage that way.
How would you recommend that this change? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers