2009/8/27 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>: > Greg Stark wrote: >> Now why did this message get delayed by 4 hours before maia-1 >> delivered it to me? That was long enough in this to completely lose >> the thread of conversation. >> >> Received: from postgresql.org (mail.postgresql.org [200.46.204.86]) >> by maia-1.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2909CAFD073; >> Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:21:19 +0000 (UTC) >> Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) >> by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC3463486D >> for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql....@mail.postgresql.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 >> 20:52:17 -0300 (ADT) > > Moderator delay? I note that the message jumped to me from mx2.hub.org > instead of maia-1, but at exactly the same time (down to seconds) -- but > at a different time zone.
Quite likely. It's often not possible to see the difference between moderation delay and mailsystem breakage delay, without looking at the logfiles. It'd be kind of neat of majordomo could insert a "held for moderation at <time>" and "released from moderation at <time>" headers or something. Anybody know if that's possible to do? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
