"Greg Sabino Mullane" <g...@turnstep.com> wrote: > - > Plan: > Node Type: Index Scan > Scan Direction: Forward > Index Name: pg_class_relname_nsp_index > Relation Name: pg_class > Alias: pg_class > Startup Cost: 0.00 > Total Cost: 8.27 > Plan Rows: 1 > Plan Width: 0 > Actual Startup Time: 0.019 > Actual Total Time: 0.019 > Actual Rows: 0 > Actual Loops: 1 > Index Cond: "(relname = 'foo\"bar\"'::name)" > Triggers: > Total Runtime: 0.058 +1 for including this format. On a ten point scale for human readability, I'd give this about a nine. It's something I'd be comfortable generating in order to annotate and include in an email to programmers or managers who wouldn't have a clue how to read the current text version of a plan. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
