On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Joshua D. Drake<j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 07:44 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On ons, 2009-09-02 at 12:52 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> > Isn't "core" supposed to be the release manager? >> >> The core team has historically been the release *maker* and has some >> done management of the final phases of that process. But I think the >> sentiment is growing that we need more management throughout the entire >> release cycle. > > O.k. so a "release" team. Cool. I am assuming the team would be more > directed toward upcoming major release versus minor releases to past > revisions. We already pretty much have that under control between -core > and -packagers. Yes?
+1. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers