Joshua D. Drake escribió: > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 15:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I'm confused. Are you saying that pg_class will never get bloated, so > > > we don't need a way to debloat it? I realize that with HOT bloat is > > > much less of a problem than it used to be, but surely it's not > > > altogether impossible... > > > > Well, it's certainly *possible*, I'm just questioning the assertion that > > it's necessarily a common situation. > > Depends on your definition of common. It is very easy for someone to > blow away their vacuum settings in such a way that it will become > bloated pretty quick.
No problem, just CLUSTER that table same as today. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
