Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > What we need is a system where base types are represented > by an OID, but derived types (list and functional types) are built up > using type constructors that take other types as arguments.
This is SQL, not Haskell. What you suggest seems about two orders of magnitude more complex than real-world applications could justify. (so where is pl/haskell, anyway?) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers