On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:37:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > While I'm at least as big a fan of generic options as the next > > person, syntax is cheap. > > No, it *isn't* cheap. Particularly not for COPY, for which we need > an ad-hoc parser in psql.
Is there some way we can use the regular parser, as plpgsql is moving to, or is there just too much wound into the server? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
