Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > So, I guess I'm sadly left feeling that we should probably reject this > patch. Anyone want to argue otherwise?
+1. I'm really hoping to get something done about the plpgsql parsing
situation before 8.5 is out, so this should be a dead end anyway.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
