Kevin Grittner wrote: > Greg Smith <gsm...@gregsmith.com> wrote: >> I don't think running that program going to fly for a production >> quality integrated replication setup though. The UI admins are >> going to want would allow querying this easily via a standard >> database query. Most monitoring systems can issue psql queries but >> not necessarily run a remote binary. I think that parts of >> pg_controldata needs to get exposed via some number of built-in UDFs >> instead, and whatever new internal state makes sense too. I could >> help out writing those, if someone more familiar with the >> replication internals can help me nail down a spec on what to watch. > > IMO, it would be best if the status could be sent via NOTIFY.
To where? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
