On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 12:03 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > Interesting :) I take it op1..opN (it's opN, not op2, right?) need to > commute?
Yeah, it's opN. And they should commute, but my current patch won't stop you. I think I should stop that though, it's pretty difficult to think of a good use-case for that and there is all kinds of danger. > * "generalized-uniqueness constraints" > the hyphen disambiguates I don't like using the word "unique" in the description, I think it only adds to the confusion. > * "operator-based constraints" > A little math-ier, but talks about the API rather than details of > the server implementation. I like this much better. Maybe "index operator constraints" or "operator index constraints"? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers